You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. The Associate Editor evaluates the submission, potentially in collaboration with other Editors (including in-house Managing Editors), and decides whether it should be sent for peer review based on the editorial criteria of the journal of novelty and significance and overall technical quality. Preprint archives do not compromise novelty. We cannot offer to provide corrected reprints with higher image quality if only poor quality images were supplied at accept stage. Code availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required): The underlying code [and training/validation datasets] for this study is available in [repository name] and can be accessed via this link [insert persistent URL to code]. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be held to rigorous standards with respect to experimental methods and characterization of compounds. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. Peer review times vary per journal. So don't worry if its taking a long time: its just how the process works. Multi-part/panel figures must be prepared and arranged as a single image file (including all sub-parts; a, b, c, etc.). Watch the Checking the status of your submission video for more information. ICP14018916-1 Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. I think it seems a long time for this step. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Although our Editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, the journal is not responsible for the conduct of its referees. npj Breast Cancer . "The male with the appointment at the university? The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". Ideally no more than two resubmissions will be considered for each manuscript, following which we will try to reach a final decision on publication. Relevant grant or contribution numbers should be included. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. If this a 'Reject and Transfer' type of decision and no previous editor has done so, you will be prompted to select target journals for the transfer offer before the Notify Author page appears. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. Authors should use approved nomenclature for gene symbols, and use symbols rather than italicized full names (for example Ttn, not titin). A competing interests statement is required for all accepted papers published in the npj Series journals. (1), 147-153. The cover letter is an excellent opportunity to briefly discuss the context and importance of the submitted work and why it is appropriate for the journal. and JavaScript. For all studies using custom code that is deemed central to the conclusions, a statement must be included in the Methods section, under the heading "Code availability", indicating whether and how the code can be accessed, including any restrictions. Correspondence and all forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the Editors. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party name] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. | Authors should describe the experimental protocol in detail, referring to amounts of reagents in parentheses, when possible (e.g. If this is not possible in a combined manuscript file, authors should either submit separate high resolution figure files or deposit image data in a suitable repository (e.g. on 01 Dec, 2017, Answered by Himanshu Sharma How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Timing Service of Requests and Time for Responses. If there is no competinginterest, a statement declaring this is still required. Failure to do so, or to adhere to the following guidelines, can significantly delay publication of your work. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Article titles should be in Roman text, the first word of the title should be capitalized and the title written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop. If the authors ask the Editors to consider the previous reviews, they should include a note explaining the relationship between the submitted manuscript and the previous submission and (assuming it has been revised in light of the referees' criticisms) give a point-by-point response to the referees. In today's Big Idea, author Christian Klaver invites us to take a look into the magical world he created for his book-loving daughter. Please watch the Submission status explainer video below for more information. The cover letter is not shared with the referees, and should be used to provide confidential information, such as conflicts of interest, and to declare any related work that is in press or submitted elsewhere. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. Printed journals: 25.0%, Manuscripts submitted to npj Precision Oncology do not need to adhere to our formatting requirements at the point of initial submission; formatting requirements only apply at the time of acceptance. The peer review of any submissions for which the Editor has a competing interest is handled by another Editor who has no competing interests, to ensure that the evaluation of these submissions is completely objective. Authors should provide sequencing or functional data that validates the identity of their biological constructs (plasmids, fusion proteins, site-directed mutants, etc.) The npj Series journals use standard Nature referencing style. Authors may also choose to submit their manuscript to a journal outside of the Nature Portfolio. For proposed gene names that are not already approved, please submit the gene symbols to the appropriate nomenclature committees as soon as possible, as these must be deposited and approved before publication of an article. All referees agree to these conditions before the journal sends them a manuscript to assess. We encourage you to make them available by uploading the structures in any of the existing data repositories (see e.g. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Use of the rainbow color scale should be avoided. | In addition, Reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. Based on the Reviewer recommendations, you can use the action buttons to make a decision. The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models. The author submits a manuscript and it receives a tracking number. 5 months is a really long time for a paper to be under the status of "Editor Assigned". 3170 USD as publication fees (article processing charges or APCs). Editors and Reviewers will be responsible for assessing the completeness of the characterization. Acceptable formats are:ai, .eps, .pdf, .ps and .svg for fully editable vector-based art; layered .psd and .tif for editable layered art; .psd, .tif, .png and .jpg for bitmap images; .ppt if fully editable and without styling effects; ChemDraw (.cdx) for chemical structures. 0, 89 Such services include those provided by Springer Nature Author Services and American Journal Experts. If the data do not meet the assumptions of the test, then a non-parametric alternative should be used instead. URLs for web sites should be cited parenthetically in the text, not in the reference list; articles in formal, peer-reviewed online journals should be included in the reference list. Competing interests may take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one): All authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.